From: Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
Recently, I was asked to look at the recent events through the lens of military history. I have joined the cast of thousands who have written an "open letter to Americans."
Dear friends and fellow Americans 14 September, 2001
Like everyone else in this great country, I am reeling from last week's
attack on our sovereignty. But unlike some, I am not reeling from
surprise. As a career soldier and a student and teacher of military
history, I have a different perspective and I think you should hear it.
This war will be won or lost by the American citizens, not diplomats,
politicians or soldiers. Let me briefly explain.
In spite of what the media, and even our own government is telling us,
this act was not committed by a group of mentally deranged fanatics. To
dismiss them as such would be among the gravest of mistakes. This attack
was committed by a ferocious, intelligent and dedicated adversary. Don't
take this the wrong way. I don't admire these men and I deplore their
tactics, but I respect their capabilities. The many parallels that have
been made with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor are apropos. Not only because it was a brilliant sneak attack against a complacent America, but also because we may well be pulling our new adversaries out of caves 30 years after we think this war is over, just like my father's generation had to do with the formidable Japanese in the years following WW II.
These men hate the United States with all of their being, and we must not underestimate the power of their moral commitment. Napoleon, perhaps the world's greatest combination of soldier and statesman, stated "the moral is to the physical as three is to one." Patton thought the Frenchman underestimated its importance and said moral conviction was five times more important in battle than physical strength. Our enemies are willing - better said anxious -- to give their lives for their cause. How committed are we in America? And for how long? In addition to
demonstrating great moral conviction, the recent attack demonstrated a
mastery of some of the basic fundamentals of warfare taught to most
military officers worldwide, namely simplicity, security and surprise.
When I first heard rumors that some of these men may have been trained
at our own Air War College, it made perfect sense to me. This was not a
random act of violence, and we can expect the same sort of military
competence to be displayed in the battle to come.
This war will escalate, with a good portion of it happening right here
in the good ol' U.S. of A. These men will not go easily into the night.
They do not fear us. We must not fear them. In spite of our overwhelming
conventional strength as the world's only "superpower" (a truly silly
term), we are the underdog in this fight. As you listen to the carefully
scripted rhetoric designed to prepare us for the march for war, please
realize that America is not equipped or seriously trained for the battle
ahead. To be certain, our soldiers are much better than the enemy, and
we have some excellent "counter-terrorist" organizations, but they are mostly trained for hostage rescues, airfield seizures, or the occasional "body snatch," (which may come in handy). We will be fighting a war of annihilation, because if their early efforts are any indication, our enemy is ready and willing to die to the last
man.
Eradicating the enemy will be costly and time consuming. They have
already deployed their forces in as many as 20 countries, and are likely
living the lives of everyday citizens. Simply put, our soldiers will be
tasked with a search and destroy mission on multiple foreign landscapes,
and the public must be patient and supportive until the strategy and
tactics can be worked out. For the most part, our military is still in
the process of redefining itself and presided over by men and women who
grew up with - and were promoted because they excelled in - Cold War
doctrine, strategy and tactics. This will not be linear warfare, there
will be no clear "centers of gravity" to strike with high technology
weapons. Our vast technological edge will certainly be helpful, but it
will not be decisive. Perhaps the perfect metaphor for the coming battle was introduced by the terrorists themselves aboard the hijacked aircraft -- this will be a knife fight, and it will be won or lost by the ingenuity and will of citizens and
soldiers, not by software or smart bombs. We must also be patient with
our military leaders.
Unlike Americans who are eager to put this messy
time behind us, our adversaries have time on their side, and they will use it. They plan to fight a battle of attrition, hoping to drag the battle out until the
American public loses its will to fight. This might be difficult to
believe in this euphoric time of flag waving and patriotism, but it is
generally acknowledged that America lacks the stomach for a long fight.
We need only look as far back as Vietnam, when North Vietnamese General
Vo Nguyen Giap (also a military history teacher) defeated the United
States of America without ever winning a major tactical battle. American
soldiers who marched to war cheered on by flag waving Americans in 1965
were reviled and spat upon less than three years later when they
returned. Although we hope that Usama Bin Laden is no Giap, he is
certain to understand and employ the concept. We can expect not only
large doses of pain like the recent attacks, but also less audacious
"sand in the gears" tactics, ranging from livestock infestations to
attacks at water supplies and power distribution facilities.
These attacks are designed to hit us in our "comfort zone" forcing the
average American to "pay more and play less" and eventually eroding our
resolve. But it can only work if we let it. It is clear to me that the
will of the American citizenry - you and I - is the center of gravity
the enemy has targeted. It will be the fulcrum upon which victory or
defeat will turn.
He believes us to be soft, impatient, and self-centered. He may be
right, but if so, we must change. The Prussian general Carl Von
Clausewitz, (the most often quoted and least read military theorist in
history), says that there is a "remarkable trinity of war" that is
composed of the (1) will of the people, (2) the political leadership of
the government, and (3) the chance and probability that plays out on the
field of battle, in that order. Every American citizen was in the cross
hairs of last Tuesday's attack, not just those that were unfortunate
enough to be in the World Trade Center or Pentagon. The will of the
American people will decide this war. If we are to win, it will be
because we have what it takes to persevere through a few more hits,
learn from our mistakes, improvise, and adapt. If we can do that, we
will eventually prevail. Everyone I've talked to in the past few days
has shared a common frustration, saying in one form or another "I just
wish I could do something!" You are already doing it. Just keep faith in
America, and continue to support your President and military, and the
outcome is certain.
If we fail to do so, the outcome is equally certain.
Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
Former Director of Military History, USAF Academy
God Bless America
Former Director of Military History, USAF Academy
